A Question, Please

gailsimone:

I’m curious about something.

How many of you came to the DC or Marvel universes initially through either the films, or animated series?

Did you fall in love with superheroes through comics, or was your first real exposure to them from other media?

And finally, specifically, does your love for a certain character or team stem in any way from film or animation, by which I mean, are you a Batman or X-men fan, for example, at least partially due to the films or cartoons?

This is for a reason…thanks!

I came in through the comics, and didn’t really get into films and cartoons until I was an adult, sadly. (Or awesomely?) (Because watching things like B:BATB now is amazing.)

My tolerance for certain characters definitely comes from the movies, though. I can’t even handle Tony Stark in the comics, for a multitude of reasons, whereas movie!Tony Stark is much more palatable.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 — 553 notes

Why are my tomato plants dying

Sunday, June 16, 2013 — 1 note

Ugh why is finding freelance work so fucking hard. I just need some extra money to pay my bills, world, is that really too much to ask?

Sunday, June 16, 2013

I want an entire road trip movie that’s just the Hound and Arya road trippin’.

Saturday, June 15, 2013 — 5 notes

What Your Culture Really Says

lol my workplace. If you don’t count me, the dev team and creative team are all men and work in the back office. The client-facing/administrative/etc teams are all women and work in the front office.

It is so fucked up. My team lead brought it up to me once during a one-on-one and was like why do you think that is? And I’m just like DO YOU REALLY WANT ME TO CALL Y’ALL CLEARLY UNCONSCIOUSLY MISOGYNIST? BECAUSE THAT IS MY ANSWER.

(I did not say that)

I find it most frustrating because I feel like people are aware of it and there’s nothing I can do to change it because I have exactly zero input in the hiring process.

I don’t know, I have a lot of feels about my job and how people at my job view me and other women who do what I do.

incandescentquill:

tatterdemalionamberite:

binghsien:

aporeticelenchus:

heidi8:

sonneillonv:

dressthesavage:

narwhalsareunderwaterunicorns:

anglofile:

spicyshimmy:

how is it possible to love fictional characters this much and also have people always been this way?

like, did queen elizabeth lie in bed late sometimes thinking ‘VERILY I CANNOT EVEN FOR MERCUTIO HATH SLAIN ME WITH FEELS’ 

was caesar like ‘ET TU ODYSSEUS’ 

sometimes i wonder

image

oh my GOD

the answer is yes they did. there’s a lot of research about the highly emotional reactions to the first novels widely available in print. 

here’s a thing; the printing press was invented in 1450 and whilst it was revolutionary it wasn’t very good. but then it got better over time and by the 16th century there were publications, novels, scientific journals, folios, pamphlets and newspapers all over Europe. at first most were educational or theological, or reprints of classical works.

however, novels gained in popularity, as basically what most people wanted was to read for pleasure. they became salacious, extremely dramatic, with tragic heroines and doomed love and flawed heroes (see classical literature, only more extreme.) books in the form of letters were common. sensationalism was par the course and apparently used to teach moral lessons. there was also a lot of erotica floating around. 

but here’s the thing: due to the greater availability of literature and the rise of comfy furniture (i shit you not this is an actual historical fact, the 16th and 17th century was when beds and chairs got comfy) people started reading novels for pleasure, women especially. as these novels were highly emotional, they too became…highly emotional. there are loads of contemporary reports of young women especially fainting, having hysterics, or crying fits lasting for days due to the death of a character or their otp’s doomed love. they became insensible over books and characters, and were very vocal about it. men weren’t immune-there’s a long letter a middle-aged man wrote to the author of his favourite work basically saying that the novel is too sad, he can’t handle all his feels, if they don’t get together he won’t be able to go on, and his heart is already broken at the heroine’s tragic state (IIRC ehh). 

conservatives at the time were seriously worried about the effects of literature on people’s mental health, and thought it damaging to both morals and society. so basically yes it is exactly like what happens on tumblr when we cry over attractive British men, only my historical theory (get me) is that their emotions were even more intense, as they hadn’t had a life of sensationalist media to numb the pain for them beforehand in the same way we do, nor did they have the giant group therapy session that is tumblr. 

(don’t even get me started on the classical/early medieval dudes and their boners for the Iliad i will be here all week. suffice to say, the members of the Byzantine court used Homeric puns instead of talking normally to each other if someone who hand’t studied the classics was in the room. they had dickish fandom in-jokes. boom.) 

I needed to know this.

See, we’re all just the current steps in a time-honored tradition! (And this post is good to read along with Affectingly’s post this week about old-school-fandom-and-history-and-stuff.

Ancient Iliad fandom is intense

Alexander the Great and and his boyfriend totally RPed Achilles and Patroclus. Alexander shipped that hard. (It’s possible that this story is apocryphal, but that would just mean that ancient historians were writing RPS about Alexander and Hephaestion RPing Iliad slash and honestly that’s just as good).

And then there’s this gem from Plato:

“Very different was the reward of the true love of Achilles towards his lover Patroclus - his lover and not his love (the notion that Patroclus was the beloved one is a foolish error into which Aeschylus has fallen, for Achilles was surely the fairer of the two, fairer also than all the other heroes; and, as Homer informs us, he was still beardless, and younger far)” - Symposium

That’s right: 4th Century BCE arguments about who topped. Nihil novi sub sole my friends.

Note that the printing press in China is invented much earlier and it has basically the same effect. Social conservatives in the censor bureau censored huge amounts of literature and poetry because of the devastating effect it had on the literati class (who formed most of the government bureaucracy, let’s not forget: So your state governor can’t work this week because he’s having Baoyu / Daiyu feels.) This did not stop it from leaking out anyway, in secret editions and hand-copied versions. And OMG the feels that these people have. There’s basically a constant struggle between the censors and this underground fandom, most novels are copied chapter-by-chapter, with people inserting fanfic chapters when they don’t have all the material (so if you have chapters 2, 3, 4, 10, 12 of your favorite book you might write your own 5-9 and circulate them) or just writing straight-up fanfic (famously in Water Margin and Red Chamber it _becomes canon_ after the author’s death.)

This post is the best thing, every part of it. Nothing to add except wow. 

I’ve reblogged this before, but it had less information on it then.   Shakespeare is almost entirely stuff we’d call fanfiction nowadays and his histories are RPF. We have evidence medieval nobility did things a lot like weekend-long LARP as entertainment, with paid performers as game organizers and NPCs.  For centuries, there have been rumors that Queen Victoria knighted Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in order to pressure him into retconning Reichenbach and continuing to write Sherlock Holmes stories.  

I was an enormous Tolkien geek in middle school, and went as far as reading a lot of his letters/a lot of Simarillion meta.  The short version is, he deliberately left gaps in the Silmarillion because Tolkien, as a professor of language and mythology, believed that for nearly all of human history storytelling had been participatory and involved many tellers of the same tales.  He thought early-to-mid 20th century pop-culture and mass media were destructive because people did far less telling of stories, claiming of stories, and reworking of stories.  I am pretty sure that, despite being a stuffy old professorial Christian white dude who would probably not read any porny fic or watch shippy vids, Tolkien is beaming in his grave over such things’ existence - over participatory storytelling having finally made its glorious comeback, over the 20th century’s approach to narrative being firmly established as an abberant nightmare that is thankfully mostly over. Did we get mythos we all reference and participate in to come back in style?  Oh, by Harry Potter’s scar and every Jedi’s lightsaber, have we ever pulled that one off. 

It’s nice to know that getting hysterical over imaginary people has been happening since forever.

Friday, June 7, 2013 — 53,132 notes

lizznotliz:

Tumblr. Tumblr.

We need to talk about Claudia Donovan.

Claudia Donovan is one of the characters on Warehouse 13. The whole show is pretty solid - a lot goofy, a little wacky, surprising adept at slapping you in the face with ~feels~ more often than not - but Claudia Donovan. Dear reader, she is the best.

How does Claudia introduce herself? By hacking into the government’s (nay, the world’s) biggest secret complex, kidnapping the proprietor who has worked there for something like forty years, and then saving her brother from an interdimensional rift (which said proprietor-who-theoretically-knows-everything said didn’t exist). All of that? Happens in her FIRST EPISODE. Hacks, kidnaps, saves. What does she do from then on? She completely upgrades the secret complex’s system, invents a bunch of awesome shit, sasses everyone, and generally keeps the proprietor on his toes.

Oh, and then there was that time she played Hendrix’s guitar.

Oh, and the time she brought her dead best friend back to life.

Oh, and the time that H.G. Freaking Wells told her she had a “glorious destiny.”

Now I’m not saying Claudia is perfect. A) Perfect characters don’t exist, and B) when they do, they are hideously boring. No, Claudia’s flaws come in these two lovely flavors: a severe lack of self-worth and some mondo abandonment issues. Of course, you would, too, if your parents died when you were a child, your brother who was raising you disappeared (the aforementioned interdimensional rift), and then you got committed to an asylum because everyone thought you were crazy for thinking your brother was still alive. Oh yeah, and they gave you electroshock therapy when you were in the institution. Issues, this girl has them. Now, Claudia likes to play tough and she covers up a lot of it with bravado and jokes, but they like to rear their ugly heads every now and again, as issues tend to do. But they make her who she is and thank God she found the Warehouse, this place filled with people who love her and appreciate her and show her how valued and brilliant and awesome she is. She is constantly fighting to believe that her team won’t abandon her like everyone else in her life has and to accept the compliments that they give her. (If she brings up her talents as an inventor/hacker, she’s all confidence; someone else asks her to save the day and she’s suddenly fighting against those self-worth issues. It’s an interesting, realistic dichotomy.) That being said, she’s definitely made progress since the beginning of the series. Hell, in the last episode, she actually cracked a joke about her therapy:

Abigail: You haven’t had much positive experience with therapy, have you?
Claudia: When I got electroshock therapy, one of the gator clips was marked positive. Does that count?

This is a kid who basically grew up with no family, no positive reinforcement, only people telling her that she was crazy and alone. Now she’s all grown up and she realizes that she’s A) not crazy, and B) [thanks to the Warehouse] not alone.

Did I mentioned she is literally fated to be the next Caretaker (aka Big Boss) of this super secret complex?

Did I mention the sass? Oh golly, so much sass.

How many shows do you watch where the resident technological genius / hacker / inventor is a woman? Warehouse 13 is one of my WHY AREN’T MORE PEOPLE WATCHING THIS SHOW shows for many reasons. All I’m saying is that Claudia Donovan should be really high (read: first) on your list of reasons. ‘Cause, damn, y’all. If you don’t immediately fall in love with this ginger fireball, I don’t know what is wrong with you.

(Also, Allison Scagliotti has a face that will frakking BREAK YOUR HEART when the occasion calls for it. Just warning you know. Scags = the best face.)

P.S. THIS SHOW PASSES THE BECHDEL TEST WITH CRAZY FLYING COLORS.

There is nothing about this post that is not perfect, much like Claudia.

(via fringe-element)

Remember that bit in Silent Hill (the game) where like you’re in a place with lockers and something rattles in one of them and you’re like fuck no oh fuck no and then a fucking *cat* jumps out and you almost die of fright?

THE KITTEN JUST DID THAT TO ME WHILE I WAS TURNING ALL THE LIGHTS ON.

Saturday, June 1, 2013 — 3 notes

BAD IDEA

BAD IDEA BAD IDEA BAD IDEA

Saturday, June 1, 2013 — 1 note

IT STARTS OUT WITH PYRAMID HEAD, HOW MUCH WORSE CAN IT POSSIBLY GET?

Saturday, June 1, 2013 — 2 notes